Skip to main content

Area Association Members Address NOVA Delegation to the General Assembly


On Saturday morning, January 10, 2026, the Fairfax County Delegation to the Virginia General Assembly convened its annual Pre-Session Public Hearing, with Delegate Vivian Watts serving as chair. Over seventy residents of Fairfax County, including Board of Supervisors Chairman Jeff McKay and Mason District Supervisor Andres Jimenez—who also chairs the Board’s Legislative Committee—attended and addressed a diverse array of legislative issues.

Representatives from the No Fairfax Casino Coalition spoke on behalf of their respective organizations, articulating comprehensive objections to the proposed Tysons Casino legislation. In addition to voicing opposition to casino development, Jennifer Falcone, Secretary of Citizens For Great Falls, highlighted topics emphasizing the need to preserve local authority over zoning matters and encouraged the General Assembly Delegation to enhance public safety through expanded speed enforcement technology.

This excerpt includes testimony provided by:

·      Lynne Mulston, President, Reston Citizens Association

·      Charles Anderson, Vienna Town Council and No Fairfax Casino Coalition

·      Jennifer Falcone, Secretary, Citizens for Great Falls

·      Paula Martino, President, Tysons Stakeholders Alliance

·      Sally Horn, Greater Tysons Citizens Coalition

·      Travis Johnson, Board President, Reston Association

 

CFGF Issues 2026 Legislative Scorecard and Priorities

 

Citizens For Great Falls published its 2026 legislative priorities in advance of the 2026 Virginia Legislative Session "Pre-filing period," which began on Monday, Nov.17. The scorecard outlines the organization's list of topic areas it urges the General Assembly to consider. It was also submitted to the Fairfax County Board of Supervisors, which took up its own legislative program at its regular meeting on Nov. 18.

 

The complete CFGF Legislative Scorecard and Priorities document may be viewed here: CFGF Legislative Scorecard and Priorities 2026

CFGF Comments on the Latest School Boundary Policy Change Process. 
Read the White Paper at: CFGF White Paper on School Boundary Policy Changes- Call For Action, Jan 15, 2026

News / Articles

CFGF Submits Comments on Proposed Zoning Amendment

Peter Falcone | Published on 7/15/2025

July 15, 2025 (Great Falls) As our community has commercial and Industrial districts in proximity to residential districts, CFGF has significant concerns regarding the anticipated expansion of BESS in Fairfax County, particularly due to the increasing preference for Lithium-Ion batteries, which are valued for their power density, operational performance, and economic advantages. These batteries present well-documented risks of fire and explosion, with certain incidents demonstrating that such fires can be difficult to control or extinguish promptly. Allowing BESS installations in densely populated areas may introduce unnecessary risk to local communities, particularly if By-right.

 

The CFGF is especially concerned that, in addition to potential noise and environmental impacts associated with future BESS facilities, Fairfax County should be evaluating stronger regulatory measures, including additional possible restrictions within specific zoning districts.

 

According to the staff’s preliminary discussion draft, DE has set a goal to develop or acquire 2,700 MW of energy storage capacity by 2035, with an additional requirement that at least 35% of this capacity be purchased. Moreover, many of DEs substations (potential sites for BESS) in Fairfax County are located near or within both commercial and residential areas. As a result, it is prudent to consider the potential community concerns that would arise regarding noise, pollution, and the documented fire and explosion risks associated with BESS using Lithium-Ion batteries. 

Market indications confirm that BESS constitutes a rapidly growing sector, not unlike our experiences in Fairfax County regarding the emergence of data centers in Northern Virginia. 

CFGF believes that the impending fast-paced development of BESS necessitates that this land use category requires a comprehensive understanding of the associated risks and the potential impacts on communities resulting from BESS deployment and more specificity in the zoning regulations.

 

Finally, at a minimum, we are opposed to By-right approval of BESS in residential or commercial areas and recommend that all BESS undergo the Special Exception application process. 

The complete comments are filed on the CFGF website Documents Menu Page.